DSpace Repository

Can video-assisted and three-dimensional (3D) anatomy teaching be an alternative to traditional anatomy teaching? Randomized controlled trial on muscular system anatomy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Halil
dc.contributor.author Guler, Hatice
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-20T13:49:04Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-20T13:49:04Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.citation Yilmaz, H., Güler, H. (2024). Can video-assisted and three-dimensional (3D) anatomy teaching be an alternative to traditional anatomy teaching? Randomized controlled trial on muscular system anatomy. Clin. Anat., 37(2), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24088 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0897-3806
dc.identifier.issn 1098-2353
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.24088
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001016293300001
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4820
dc.description WoS Categories: Anatomy & Morphology en_US
dc.description Web of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) en_US
dc.description Research Areas: Anatomy & Morphology en_US
dc.description.abstract The aim of this study was to determine the optimal method for teaching human anatomy by comparing classical laboratory (traditional), video-assisted and three-dimensional (3D) application methods for students who had previously received only online academic anatomy education. GPower 3.1.9.4 was used for power analysis to establish sample size. After power analysis, it was decided to have 28 people in each group. Participants were given pre-anatomy education tests and divided into four matched groups: Group 1: no additional education, Group 2: Video-assisted education, Group 3: Applied 3D anatomy education, Group 4: Practical laboratory anatomy education. Each group received 5 weeks of education in muscular system anatomy. The pre-test results showed no statistically significant differences among the groups. The post-test results showed statistically significant improvement in scores (p < 0.001): group 4; 59%, group 3; 33%, group 2; 9%. The difference between group 1 and group 2 was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The difference between the groups in post hoc comparisons with all other groups was also statistically significant (p < 0.001). The results of this study show that while the optimal anatomy teaching method is conservative, the best alternative is 3D application. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher WILEY-HOBOKEN en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1002/ca.24088 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject anatomy, education, laboratories, methods en_US
dc.subject EDUCATION, CHALLENGES, PHYSIOLOGY, YOUTUBE en_US
dc.title Can video-assisted and three-dimensional (3D) anatomy teaching be an alternative to traditional anatomy teaching? Randomized controlled trial on muscular system anatomy en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal CLINICAL ANATOMY en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-8234-4901 en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0001-9364-5948 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 37 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 227 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 232 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account