DSpace Repository

Comparison of flowmeter (transit time flow measurement) values for graft flow in three different surgical methods for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Borulu, Ferhat
dc.contributor.author Arslan, Umit
dc.contributor.author Calik, Eyuepserhat
dc.contributor.author Erkut, Bilgehan
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-20T13:47:40Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-20T13:47:40Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Borulu, F., Arslan, Ü., Çalik, E., Erkut, B. (2023). Comparison of flowmeter (transit time flow measurement) values for graft flow in three different surgical methods for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. Cardiovasc. J. Afr., 34(4), 242-247. https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2023-029 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1995-1892
dc.identifier.issn 1680-0745
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2023-029
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001026335300001
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4809
dc.description WoS Categories: Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems en_US
dc.description Web of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) en_US
dc.description Research Areas: Cardiovascular System & Cardiology en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Graft patency is the most important factor in coronary artery bypass surgery. This study aimed to compare the relationship between three different surgical methods and transit time flow measurement (TTFM), which is used to detect technical problems in anastomoses performed during coronary artery bypass graft operations and to correct them if necessary.Methods: A total of 110 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery were analysed. Of these patients, 48 were operated on by inducing cardiopulmonary arrest (group 1), 33 were operated on without inducing cardiac arrest (group 2) during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, and 29 underwent surgery on the off-pump beating heart (group 3). TTFMs were performed on all the patients' grafts. Additional surgical intervention requirements, the need for intra-operative and postoperative inotropic support, and all postoperative follow-up data were compared.Results: In total, 110 patients were measured for 301 grafts. Due to insufficient measurements performed on these patients, additional surgical intervention was performed on five grafts in group 1, five grafts in group 2, and seven grafts in group 3. These interventions enabled a normal flow rate to be achieved. The number of grafts that required revision was highest in group 3. There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data, EuroSCORE II, preoperative ejection fraction, postoperative complications and mortality rate.Conclusion: TTFM is important for detecting technical problems in grafts. We believe that all surgical methods can be applied more safely by controlling graft flow. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher CLINICS CARDIVE PUBL PTY LTD-DURBANVILLE en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.5830/CVJA-2023-029 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject transit time flow meter, coronary artery bypass surgery en_US
dc.subject ON-PUMP, HEART en_US
dc.title Comparison of flowmeter (transit time flow measurement) values for graft flow in three different surgical methods for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0001-9731-9998 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 34 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 242 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 247 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account