DSpace Repository

Explaining Skeletal System Anatomy with Classical Method, Video Assisted Method and 3D Imaging Techniques and Comparison of Learning Levels Between Methods

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, H.
dc.contributor.author Guler, H.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-20T13:44:05Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-20T13:44:05Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Yilmaz, H., Güler, H. (2023). Explaining Skeletal System Anatomy with Classical Method, Video Assisted Method and 3D Imaging Techniques and Comparison of Learning Levels Between Methods. Int. J. Morphol., 41(4), 1107-1111 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0717-9502
dc.identifier.issn 0717-9367
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001048344800019
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4781
dc.description WoS Categories: Anatomy & Morphology en_US
dc.description Web of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) en_US
dc.description Research Areas: Anatomy & Morphology en_US
dc.description.abstract The aim of this research is to introduce the ideal lecture technique to the literature by explaining the anatomy of the skeletal system using the classical method, video-assisted method and 3D imaging techniques. The research was carried out with 180 students. The number of samples was determined by power analysis (a=0.05,b=0.20, effect size=0.25). Participants were pre-screened and divided into 4 groups with the closest group mean (group 1: control group: the group that did not take anatomy lessons, group 2: video-assisted anatomy education, group 3: 3D anatomy course, group 4: classical anatomy education group). The courses in the training groups were organised as 4 hours/day, 2 days/week for 5 weeks. At the end of the course, the students were re-examined and scaled to determine the difference in scores and self-efficacy between the groups. A one-way ANOVA test was performed because the data were normally distributed when comparing between groups. The mean scores were calculated as group 1=30.22 & PLUSMN;6.24, group 2=39.02 & PLUSMN;9.15, group 3=49.77 & PLUSMN;9.20 and group 4=59.28 & PLUSMN;8.95. In the post hoc comparison, in pairwise comparisons between all groups, the differences were highly significant (p<0.001). According to the results of the self-efficacy scale, the groups were ranked as group 4>group 3>group 2>group 1 (p<0.001). According to the results of this study, the laboratory method in skeletal anatomy teaching is the best alternative to 3D anatomy teaching. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher SOC CHILENA ANATOMIA-TEMUCO en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject KEY WORDS, Anatomy, Education, Skeletal System Anatomy, Video-assisted, 3D en_US
dc.title Explaining Skeletal System Anatomy with Classical Method, Video Assisted Method and 3D Imaging Techniques and Comparison of Learning Levels Between Methods en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.identifier.volume 41 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 1107 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 1111 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account