dc.contributor.author |
Kilic, Mustafa |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dede, Dogu Omur |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kucukekenci, Ahmet Serkan |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-03-15T08:25:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-03-15T08:25:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Kiliç, M., Dede, DÖ., Küçükekenci, AS. (2023). Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments. BMC Oral Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1472-6831 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000960882800001 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4190 |
|
dc.description |
WoS Categories: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine |
en_US |
dc.description |
Web of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
en_US |
dc.description |
Research Areas: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers to indirect laboratory composite (ILC) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) veneering materials.MethodsPolymer specimens (7 x 7x2 mm) were sectioned from PEEK and PEKK discs (N = 294) and randomly allocated to 7 groups (n = 20); untreated (Cnt), plasma (Pls), 98% sulfuric acid (Sa), sandblasting with 110 mu m Al2O3 (Sb), tribochemical silica coating with 110 mu m silica modified Al2O3 (Tbc), Sb + Sa, Tbc + Sa. Scanning electron microscopy assessments were performed on one sample of each treatment group, and veneering materials were applied to the remaining specimens (n = 10). The specimens were subjected to the SBS test after being soaked in distilled water (24 h, 37 degrees C). Three-way ANOVA, independent sample t-test, and Tukey HSD test were performed for statistical analyses (alpha = .05).ResultsThe surface treatment, polymer, veneering material types, and their interactions were significant on SBS results according to the 3-way ANOVA (p < 0.001). The SBS values of ILC veneered groups were significantly higher than LDC groups, regardless of surface treatment and polymer type (p < 0.05). The highest SBS values were obtained for Sa-applied ILC veneered PEEK (21.55 +/- 1.45 MPa) and PEKK (17.04 +/- 1.99 MPa) polymer groups (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe effect of surface treatment and veneering materials may be significant on the SBS values of PAEKs. Therefore, the application parameters of surface treatments should be more specified for the applied veneering material and polymer type. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
BMC-LONDON |
en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2 |
en_US |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
en_US |
dc.subject |
PEEK, PEKK, Surface treatment, Shear bond strength, Veneering material |
en_US |
dc.subject |
RESIN COMPOSITE, PEEK, PRETREATMENTS, PLASMA, POLYETHERKETONEKETONE, CEMENTS |
en_US |
dc.title |
Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments |
en_US |
dc.type |
article |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
BMC ORAL HEALTH |
en_US |
dc.contributor.department |
Ordu Üniversitesi |
en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID |
0000-0003-1021-5702 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.volume |
23 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issue |
1 |
en_US |