DSpace Repository

Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kilic, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Dede, Dogu Omur
dc.contributor.author Kucukekenci, Ahmet Serkan
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-15T08:25:23Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-15T08:25:23Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Kiliç, M., Dede, DÖ., Küçükekenci, AS. (2023). Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments. BMC Oral Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6831
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000960882800001
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4190
dc.description WoS Categories: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine en_US
dc.description Web of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) en_US
dc.description Research Areas: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine en_US
dc.description.abstract BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymers to indirect laboratory composite (ILC) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) veneering materials.MethodsPolymer specimens (7 x 7x2 mm) were sectioned from PEEK and PEKK discs (N = 294) and randomly allocated to 7 groups (n = 20); untreated (Cnt), plasma (Pls), 98% sulfuric acid (Sa), sandblasting with 110 mu m Al2O3 (Sb), tribochemical silica coating with 110 mu m silica modified Al2O3 (Tbc), Sb + Sa, Tbc + Sa. Scanning electron microscopy assessments were performed on one sample of each treatment group, and veneering materials were applied to the remaining specimens (n = 10). The specimens were subjected to the SBS test after being soaked in distilled water (24 h, 37 degrees C). Three-way ANOVA, independent sample t-test, and Tukey HSD test were performed for statistical analyses (alpha = .05).ResultsThe surface treatment, polymer, veneering material types, and their interactions were significant on SBS results according to the 3-way ANOVA (p < 0.001). The SBS values of ILC veneered groups were significantly higher than LDC groups, regardless of surface treatment and polymer type (p < 0.05). The highest SBS values were obtained for Sa-applied ILC veneered PEEK (21.55 +/- 1.45 MPa) and PEKK (17.04 +/- 1.99 MPa) polymer groups (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe effect of surface treatment and veneering materials may be significant on the SBS values of PAEKs. Therefore, the application parameters of surface treatments should be more specified for the applied veneering material and polymer type. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher BMC-LONDON en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1186/s12903-023-02879-2 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject PEEK, PEKK, Surface treatment, Shear bond strength, Veneering material en_US
dc.subject RESIN COMPOSITE, PEEK, PRETREATMENTS, PLASMA, POLYETHERKETONEKETONE, CEMENTS en_US
dc.title Comparing the shear bond strength of veneering materials to the PAEKs after surface treatments en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal BMC ORAL HEALTH en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0003-1021-5702 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 23 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account