dc.contributor.author |
Omezli, Mehmet Melih |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Torul, Damla |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Yilmaz, Eyup Birkan |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-03-15T06:55:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-03-15T06:55:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Omezli, MM., Torul, D., Yilmaz, EB. (2022). Is Teledentistry a Feasible Alternative for People Who Need Special Care?. Dis. Med. Public Health Prep., 17. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2022.38 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1935-7893 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1938-744X |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2022.38 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000780788500001 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4050 |
|
dc.description |
WoS Categories: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health |
en_US |
dc.description |
Web of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) |
en_US |
dc.description |
Research Areas: Public, Environmental & Occupational Health |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and acceptability of teledentistry as a vehicle that provides enhanced delivery of oral care for the people who need special care (PNSC). Methods: Between January 2018 and September 2020, PNSC who were admitted in the study were either waiting for a follow-up (F) appointment or on a waiting list. An examination via video call was carried out for initial examination (IE) and F purposes. The virtual examination was scored by the clinician who performed the examinations. The experience of the participants was evaluated with a satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Forty PNSC (26 females, 14 males) between ages 7 and 48 years (21.17 +/- 10.62) participated in the study. According to the clinician ratings, the accuracy of the examination was rated as the lowest. The F group had higher scores when compared to the IE group regarding clinician rating. No significant differences were found in terms of the scoring of the clinician and patient/parent satisfaction regarding cooperation status and type of examination (P >= 0.05). Conclusions: Through adequate adaptation of the technology into clinical practice and overcoming the barriers for wider implementation, the teledentistry approach could be a reliable and feasible alternative in triaging, treatment planning, and F purposes for PNSC. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS-NEW YORK |
en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1017/dmp.2022.38 |
en_US |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
en_US |
dc.subject |
disability, m-Health, remote care |
en_US |
dc.subject |
TELEMEDICINE |
en_US |
dc.title |
Is Teledentistry a Feasible Alternative for People Who Need Special Care? |
en_US |
dc.type |
article |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS |
en_US |
dc.contributor.department |
Ordu Üniversitesi |
en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID |
0000-0003-2323-606X |
en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID |
0000-0001-5327-1953 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.volume |
17 |
en_US |