DSpace Repository

Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kapti, Hasan Burhanettin
dc.contributor.author Erdem, Burak
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-15T06:46:21Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-15T06:46:21Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Kapti, HB., Erdem, B. (2023). Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. Cureus J Med Sci, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36365 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2168-8184
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36365
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000980799800026
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4010
dc.description WoS Categories: Medicine, General & Internal en_US
dc.description Web of Science Index: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) en_US
dc.description Research Areas: General & Internal Medicine en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) causes excessive eye tearing or mucoid discharge. Twenty percent of one-year-olds globally have CNLDO. There are many sources that offer information to parents. This study evaluates the quality and accuracy of CNLDO-related YouTube videos. Methods The first 100 videos that appeared after typing congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the YouTube search engine were evaluated. These videos were also analyzed and scored using the DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and Global Quality Scoring (GQS) systems. Results Forty videos met the inclusion criteria. The mean DISCERN score was 47.3 ?? 9.15, JAMA was 1.72 ?? 0.87, and GQS was 3.1 ?? 0.81. The duration of the videos uploaded by the non-physician group was significantly longer (p = 0.04). In addition, the JAMA score of the videos uploaded by the physician group was significantly higher than that of the other group (p = 0.03). Theoretical videos were longer than surgical videos (p = 0.02). DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were statistically higher in the theoretical video group (p = 0.002, p = 0.04, and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion According to our research, the quality of YouTube videos about congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is average. This information source can be improved by making videos with more detailed information about the disease and theoretical information, as well as by having health professionals look over the content that has been uploaded. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher CUREUS INC-PALO ALTO en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.7759/cureus.36365 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject youtube, jama score, global quality score, discern score, congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction en_US
dc.subject INFORMATION en_US
dc.title Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.identifier.volume 15 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account