DSpace Repository

The effect of different cleaning agents and resin cement materials on the bond strength of contaminated zirconia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sahin, Sezgi Cinel
dc.contributor.author Celik, Ersan
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-06T11:17:06Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-06T11:17:06Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Sahin, SC., Celik, E. (2022). The effect of different cleaning agents and resin cement materials on the bond strength of contaminated zirconia. Microscopy Research and Technique, 85(3), 840-847.Doi:10.1002/jemt.23953 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 1059-910X
dc.identifier.isbn 1097-0029
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23953
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000704201000001
dc.identifier.uri https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34617647
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3513
dc.description WoS Categories : Anatomy & Morphology; Biology; Microscopy Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : Anatomy & Morphology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics; Microscopy en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different cleaning methods and resin cements on the shear bond strength (SBS) of contaminated zirconia. A total of 92 disc-shaped zirconia specimens were contaminated with different procedures. Then, the specimens were grouped according to cleaning methods and resin cements: no cleaning + Variolink Esthetic DC (CNV), no cleaning + Panavia V5 (CNP), sandblasted + Variolink Esthetic DC (SBV), sandblasted + Panavia V5 (SBP), Ivoclean + Variolink Esthetic DC (ICV), Ivoclean + Panavia V5 (ICP), Katana Cleaner + Variolink Esthetic DC (KCV), and Katana Cleaner + Panavia V5 (KCP). Following an aging protocol in a 37 degrees C for 1 week, SBS analysis was performed with a universal test machine. For the surface topography and elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used. Significance was evaluated as p < .05 and p < .01. The highest SBS results were found in the SBP group, showing a statistically significant difference from all other groups (p < .05). For the same cleaning method, Panavia V5 showed statistically significantly higher SBS values than Variolink Esthetic DC (p < .01), except the CNP-CNV (p = .880) and KCP-KCV (p = .082) groups. The most detected surface elements by EDS were Zr, O, C, and N, respectively. The contaminated zirconia surfaces must be cleaned for successful adhesion. The use of phosphate-containing adhesives in combination with sandblasting will increase the adhesion strength, and universal cleaning agents can be a good alternative to sandblasting. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher WILEY HOBOKEN en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1002/jemt.23953 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject DENTAL PROSTHESES FDPS; OXIDE CERAMICS; SURVIVAL; ADHESION en_US
dc.subject adhesive resin cement; alumina-blasting; contaminated zirconia; surface cleaning; universal cleaning paste en_US
dc.title The effect of different cleaning agents and resin cement materials on the bond strength of contaminated zirconia en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-3797-770X en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0001-7623-782X en_US
dc.identifier.volume 85 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 840 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 847 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account