dc.contributor.author |
Tulga, Ayca |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Yildirim, Husniye |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-01-06T10:57:43Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-01-06T10:57:43Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Tulga, A., Yildirim, H. (2021). Effect of different cleaning methods on resin bond strength of contaminated monolithic zirconia. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 35(23), 2547-2557.Doi:10.1080/01694243.2021.1892428 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn |
0169-4243 |
|
dc.identifier.isbn |
1568-5616 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1892428 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000626384100001 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3425 |
|
dc.description |
WoS Categories : Engineering, Chemical; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary; Mechanics
Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
Research Areas : Engineering; Materials Science; Mechanics |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The present study evaluated the effects of cleaning methods on resin bond strength to contaminated monolithic zirconia. A total of 180 bar-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens (12 mm x 4 mm x 1.2 mm) were abraded with aluminum oxide and divided into nine groups (n = 10). The control group (Cnt) comprised non-contaminated or cleaned monolithic zirconia specimens. Half of the remaining samples were contaminated with saliva (S) and the other half with a silicone disclosing agent (F; Fit checker). The bonding surfaces of the specimens were cleaned with water (Sw and Fw), 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution (Sh and Fh), 37% phosphoric acid gel (Sa and Fa), or plasma treatment (Sp and Fp). The bars were luted end-to-end on the bonding surfaces using a self-adhesive resin cement with a custom-made stainless-steel mold. After 72 h of water storage, the bond strength was measured using a four-point bending test. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. The Cnt group showed the highest four-point bending strength (p < .05). There were no significant differences among the groups subjected to the cleaning methods, except the NaOCl groups (p > .05). These findings indicate that the cleaning protocol for saliva- or fit checker-contaminated monolithic zirconia ceramics must be taken into account to ensure zirconia-resin cement bond strength resistance. The plasma treatment that an alternative cleaning method for decontamination did not affect the bond strength between monolithic zirconia and resin cement. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD ABINGDON |
en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1080/01694243.2021.1892428 |
en_US |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Contamination; monolithic zirconia; plasma; cleaning procedures |
en_US |
dc.title |
Effect of different cleaning methods on resin bond strength of contaminated monolithic zirconia |
en_US |
dc.type |
article |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
en_US |
dc.contributor.department |
Ordu Üniversitesi |
en_US |
dc.identifier.volume |
35 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issue |
23 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage |
2547 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage |
2557 |
en_US |