DSpace Repository

Influence of abutment material and luting cements color on the final color of all ceramics

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dede, Dogu Omur
dc.contributor.author Armaganci, Arzu
dc.contributor.author Ceylan, Gozlem
dc.contributor.author Cankaya, Soner
dc.contributor.author Celik, Ersan
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-07T10:56:44Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-07T10:56:44Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.777114
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3218
dc.description.abstract Purpose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of different abutment materials and luting cements color on the final color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. Materials and methods. Ten A(2) shade IPS e.max Press disc shape all-ceramic specimens were prepared (11 x 1.5 mm). Three different shades (translucent, universal and white opaque) of disc shape luting cement specimens were prepared (11 x 0.2 mm). Three different (zirconium, gold-palladium and titanium) implant abutments and one composite resin disc shape background specimen were prepared at 11 mm diameter and appropriate thicknesses. All ceramic specimens colors were measured with each background and luting cement samples on a teflon mold. A digital spectrophotometer used for measurements and data recorded as CIE L(star)a(star)b(star) color co-ordinates. An optical fluid applied on to the samples to provide a good optical connection and measurements on the composite resin background was saved as the control group. Delta E values were calculated from the Delta L, Delta a and Delta b values between control and test groups and data were analyzed with one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and mean values were compared by the Tukey HSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results. One-way ANOVA of Delta L, Delta a, Delta b and Delta E values of control and test groups revealed significant differences for backgrounds and seldom for cement color groups (p the 0.05). Only zirconium implant abutment groups and gold palladium abutment with universal shade cement group were found to be clinically acceptable (Delta E <= 3.0). Conclusion. Using titanium or gold-palladium abutments for implant supported all ceramics will be esthetically questionable and white opaque cement will be helpful to mask the dark color of titanium abutment. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.3109/00016357.2013.777114 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Implant abutment luting cement all ceramic color color difference en_US
dc.title Influence of abutment material and luting cements color on the final color of all ceramics en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0001-8056-1892 en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0003-1021-5702 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 71 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 6 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 1570 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 1578 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account