DSpace Repository

Safety and efficacy of concentrated topical epinephrine use in endoscopic endonasal surgery

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bleier, Benjamin S.
dc.contributor.author Korkmaz, Hakan
dc.contributor.author Korkmaz, Mukadder
dc.contributor.author Yao, William C.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-17T07:01:18Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-17T07:01:18Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21590
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/2655
dc.description.abstract Background: Effective topical decongestion is critical for the safe performance of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES). Despite the vasoconstriction offered by topical concentrated (1: 1000) epinephrine (CE), its use has not gained widespread acceptance because of concerns over systemic absorption and its effect on blood pressure and postoperative rebound epistaxis. The purpose of this study was to examine the physiological changes in blood pressure and rate of epistaxis with use of topical CE in a variety of endoscopic nasal procedures. Methods: EES procedures using inhalational anesthesia and topical CE performed on 1140 consecutive patients (14 patients under 18 years) between 2011 and 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative epistaxis rates were recorded. Results: The mean patient age was 45.8 years (range, 5-97 years). No intraoperative cardiovascular complications related to CE use were found. Four patients (0.35%) developed postoperative epistaxis requiring intervention. The mean estimated blood loss among patients undergoing bilateral sinus surgery, skull-base surgery, and orbital decompression was (mean +/- SD) 61.7 +/- 51.6 mL, 60.1 +/- 115 mL, and 67.9 +/- 42.2 mL, respectively. The maximum mean systolic blood pressure among these groups was 108.3 +/- 28.3 mmHg, 111.9 +/- 27.6 mmHg, and 95.1 +/- 31.7 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: The use of topical CE is safe when performing endoscopic endonasal procedures. CE was not associated with any intraoperative complications. The profound intraoperative vasoconstriction does not confer a higher rate of postoperative rebound epistaxis. (C) 2015 ARS-AAOA, LLC. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher WILEY111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1002/alr.21590 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject ndoscopic sinus surgeryconcentrated epinephrineintraoperative bleedingpostoperative epistaxisvasoconstriction en_US
dc.subject TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIAOF-THE-LITERATURESINUS SURGERYSURGICAL CONDITIONSCATECHOLAMINE CARDIOMYOPATHYINHALATIONAL ANESTHESIABLOOD-LOSSCOMPLICATIONSHYPOTENSIONVASOCONSTRICTION en_US
dc.title Safety and efficacy of concentrated topical epinephrine use in endoscopic endonasal surgery en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-0988-4354 en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-9845-2165 en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0003-0783-8861 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 5 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 12 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 1118 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 1123 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account