DSpace Repository

Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Akyol, Hurkan
dc.contributor.author Cetin, Orkun
dc.contributor.author Keskin, Seda
dc.contributor.author Verit, Fatma Ferda
dc.contributor.author Zebitay, Ali Galip
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-17T06:40:57Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-17T06:40:57Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/2529
dc.description.abstract Objective: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromised ovarian reserve and ovarian blood supply. Methods: This prospective study included 49 women aged between 21 and 36 years who had undergone a cesarean section for obstetric indications. Of these, 25 underwent uterine bilateral UAL to control intractable atonic PPH. The control group consisted of 24 women who had not undergone bilateral UAL. Standard clinical parameters, the results of color Doppler screening, and ovarian reserve markers were assessed in all participants at 6 months after surgery. The clinical parameters included age, parity, cycle history, body mass index, and previous medication and/or surgery. Color Doppler screening findings included the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) for both the uterine and ovarian arteries. The ovarian reserve markers included day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, antral follicle count, and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels. Results: There were no significant differences in the ovarian reserve markers of day 3 FSH levels, antral follicle count, and AMH levels between the study and control groups (p>0.05 for all). In addition, no significant differences were observed in the PI and RI indices of the uterine and ovarian arteries (p>0.05 for all). Conclusion: In this study, we showed that bilateral UAL had no negative effects on ovarian reserve or ovarian blood supply, so this treatment should be used as a fertility preservation technique to avoid hysterectomy in patients experiencing PPH. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher KOREAN SOC REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, CHEIL MED RESEARCH INST BLDG 2F, CHEIL GENREAL HOSP, KWANDONG UNIV, COLL MED, SEOUL, 100-380, SOUTH KOREA en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Ovarian blood flow; Ovarian reserve; Uterine artery ligation; Uterine blood flow en_US
dc.title Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE-CERM en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.identifier.volume 46 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 30 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 35 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account