DSpace Repository

Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher File in Removing Calcium Hydroxide from Simulated Internal Resorption Cavity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Keskin, Cangul
dc.contributor.author Sariyilmaz, Evren
dc.contributor.author Sariyilmaz, Oznur
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-16T05:37:19Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-16T05:37:19Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.009
dc.identifier.uri https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0099239916306136?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0099239916306136%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&referrer=
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1587
dc.description.abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementary use of XP-endo Finisher file, passive ultrasonic activation (PUI), EndoActivator (EA), and CanalBrush (CB) on the removal of calcium hydroxide (CH) paste from simulated internal resorption cavities. Methods: The root canals of 110 extracted single-rooted teeth with straight canals were prepared up to size 50. The specimens were split longitudinally, and standardized internal resorption cavities were prepared with burs. The cavities and root canals were filled with CH paste. The specimens were divided into 5 groups as follows: XP-endo Finisher, EA, PUI, CB, and syringe irrigation (SI). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes, respectively. Apart from the SI group, both solutions were activated by using tested techniques for 1 minute. The quantity of CH remnants on resorption cavities was scored. Data were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: XP-endo Finisher and PUI removed significantly more CH than SI, EA, and CB (P <.05), showing no significant difference between them (P>.05). Differences among SI, EA, and CB were also non-significant (P>.05). Conclusions: None of the tested techniques render the simulated internal resorption cavities free of CH debris. XP-endo Finisher and PUI were superior to SI, CB, and EA. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.009 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Calcium hydroxide; CanalBrush; EndoActivator; passive ultrasonic activation; XP-endo Finisher en_US
dc.subject ROOT RESORPTION; CANAL SEALERS; APICAL 3RD; IN-VITRO; IRRIGATION; DIAGNOSIS en_US
dc.title Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher File in Removing Calcium Hydroxide from Simulated Internal Resorption Cavity en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0003-1711-7056 en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0003-4263-6851 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 43 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 126 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 130 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account