Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4891
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Omer Faruk-
dc.contributor.authorTemiz, Hasan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-21T13:36:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-21T13:36:19Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationCelik, OF., Temiz, H. (2020). Traditional yogurt dilemma; rich flavor vs. microbial safety: An investigation on Volatile Aroma Profiles, Chemical, and Microbiological Qualities of Traditional Yogurts. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 21(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/21.3.2813en_US
dc.identifier.issn1332-9049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/21.3.2813-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000574965200001-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4891-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories: Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science; Agriculture, Multidisciplinaryen_US
dc.descriptionWeb of Science Index: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)en_US
dc.descriptionResearch Areas: Agricultureen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to bring out chemical, physical, and microbiological quality together with volatile aroma profiles of traditional yogurts collected from the highlands of Ordu and Giresun cities in the Black Sea Region (Turkey). For this purpose, 24 traditional yogurts, 20 of which were produced from cow milk and the remaining were produced from buffalo milk, were collected and analyzes were performed. The average dry matter, protein, fat, pH, total acidity (lactic acid%), viscosity (10 degrees C), and syneresis values for cow milk and buffalo milk yogurts were 12.68 vs. 14.44%, 3.51 vs. 4.13%, 4.51 vs. 6.55%, 3.80 vs. 3.78, 1.32 vs. 1.60%, 241.09 vs. 1009.21 cP, and 17.43 vs. 9.02%, respectively. The buffalo milk yogurts had higher dry matter, protein, fat, viscosity but lower syneresis values compared to those of cow milk yogurts. The lactic acid bacteria counts were under the required number of 107 for cow yogurts while yeast & mould counts were over 105 for both cow and buffalo yogurts. Moreover, five of the cow yogurts were found to have coliforms and one being contaminated with Escherichia coli indicating unhygienic production conditions. All yogurts contained acetaldehyde, acetoin, ethanol, hexanoic acid, octanoic acid, hexanal, 2-Heptanaone, and 2-Nonanone while diacetyl could not be detected in any yogurt samples. Regarding their compositional values, homemade yogurts were acceptable however they were not appropriate for consumption microbiologically and require improved hygienic conditions for healthier products.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Project Coordination Unit of Ondokuz Mayis University (Samsun, Turkey) [PYO. MUH.1904.17.020]en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUNIV ZAGREB, FAC AGRICULTURE-ZAGREBen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5513/JCEA01/21.3.2813en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectChemical composition, aroma compounds, flavour, fermented milk, homemade yogurt, microbiological qualityen_US
dc.subjectMILK, MANUFACTURE, FERMENTATION, COWSen_US
dc.titleTraditional yogurt dilemma; rich flavor vs. microbial safety: An investigation on Volatile Aroma Profiles, Chemical, and Microbiological Qualities of Traditional Yogurtsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTUREen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-6105-4825en_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage461en_US
dc.identifier.endpage475en_US
Appears in Collections:Gıda Mühendisliği

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.