Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4010
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKapti, Hasan Burhanettin-
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Burak-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T06:46:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-15T06:46:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationKapti, HB., Erdem, B. (2023). Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. Cureus J Med Sci, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36365en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-8184-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36365-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000980799800026-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4010-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories: Medicine, General & Internalen_US
dc.descriptionWeb of Science Index: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)en_US
dc.descriptionResearch Areas: General & Internal Medicineen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) causes excessive eye tearing or mucoid discharge. Twenty percent of one-year-olds globally have CNLDO. There are many sources that offer information to parents. This study evaluates the quality and accuracy of CNLDO-related YouTube videos. Methods The first 100 videos that appeared after typing congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the YouTube search engine were evaluated. These videos were also analyzed and scored using the DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and Global Quality Scoring (GQS) systems. Results Forty videos met the inclusion criteria. The mean DISCERN score was 47.3 ?? 9.15, JAMA was 1.72 ?? 0.87, and GQS was 3.1 ?? 0.81. The duration of the videos uploaded by the non-physician group was significantly longer (p = 0.04). In addition, the JAMA score of the videos uploaded by the physician group was significantly higher than that of the other group (p = 0.03). Theoretical videos were longer than surgical videos (p = 0.02). DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were statistically higher in the theoretical video group (p = 0.002, p = 0.04, and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion According to our research, the quality of YouTube videos about congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is average. This information source can be improved by making videos with more detailed information about the disease and theoretical information, as well as by having health professionals look over the content that has been uploaded.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCUREUS INC-PALO ALTOen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7759/cureus.36365en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectyoutube, jama score, global quality score, discern score, congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructionen_US
dc.subjectINFORMATIONen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstructionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.