Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3513
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Sezgi Cinel-
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Ersan-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T11:17:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-06T11:17:06Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationSahin, SC., Celik, E. (2022). The effect of different cleaning agents and resin cement materials on the bond strength of contaminated zirconia. Microscopy Research and Technique, 85(3), 840-847.Doi:10.1002/jemt.23953en_US
dc.identifier.isbn1059-910X-
dc.identifier.isbn1097-0029-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23953-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000704201000001-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34617647-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3513-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories : Anatomy & Morphology; Biology; Microscopy Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : Anatomy & Morphology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics; Microscopyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different cleaning methods and resin cements on the shear bond strength (SBS) of contaminated zirconia. A total of 92 disc-shaped zirconia specimens were contaminated with different procedures. Then, the specimens were grouped according to cleaning methods and resin cements: no cleaning + Variolink Esthetic DC (CNV), no cleaning + Panavia V5 (CNP), sandblasted + Variolink Esthetic DC (SBV), sandblasted + Panavia V5 (SBP), Ivoclean + Variolink Esthetic DC (ICV), Ivoclean + Panavia V5 (ICP), Katana Cleaner + Variolink Esthetic DC (KCV), and Katana Cleaner + Panavia V5 (KCP). Following an aging protocol in a 37 degrees C for 1 week, SBS analysis was performed with a universal test machine. For the surface topography and elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used. Significance was evaluated as p < .05 and p < .01. The highest SBS results were found in the SBP group, showing a statistically significant difference from all other groups (p < .05). For the same cleaning method, Panavia V5 showed statistically significantly higher SBS values than Variolink Esthetic DC (p < .01), except the CNP-CNV (p = .880) and KCP-KCV (p = .082) groups. The most detected surface elements by EDS were Zr, O, C, and N, respectively. The contaminated zirconia surfaces must be cleaned for successful adhesion. The use of phosphate-containing adhesives in combination with sandblasting will increase the adhesion strength, and universal cleaning agents can be a good alternative to sandblasting.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEY HOBOKENen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/jemt.23953en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDENTAL PROSTHESES FDPS; OXIDE CERAMICS; SURVIVAL; ADHESIONen_US
dc.subjectadhesive resin cement; alumina-blasting; contaminated zirconia; surface cleaning; universal cleaning pasteen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different cleaning agents and resin cement materials on the bond strength of contaminated zirconiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-3797-770Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-7623-782Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume85en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage840en_US
dc.identifier.endpage847en_US
Appears in Collections:Protetik Diş Tedavisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.