Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3478
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoban, Gokhan-
dc.contributor.authorBuyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T11:09:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-06T11:09:05Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCoban, G., Buyuk, SK. (2021). YouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(6), 2005-2007.Doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007478en_US
dc.identifier.isbn1049-2275-
dc.identifier.isbn1536-3732-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007478-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000691810100049-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33534330-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3478-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories : Surgery Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : Surgeryen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos about distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the craniofacial region. Methods: The term distraction osteogenesis was searched on YouTube. After sorting by relevance, 80 videos were selected from 128 search results for analysis of general characteristics, primary purpose, information reliability, audiovisual quality, global quality scale (GQS), and viewers' interaction index. Viewing rate formulae were calculated for each YouTube video. The Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. Results: We classified 22 (27.5%) of the 80 videos as moderate/high-content and 58 (72.5%) as low-content. Most YouTube videos about DO were uploaded by doctors (45%) and information about DO was the most covered topic (61%). Videos from commercial companies had significantly higher GQS scores than videos uploaded by other groups (P = 0.040). In low-information content videos, GQS was highly correlated with the number of likes, whereas in moderate/high-content videos it was highly correlated with viewing rates. Conclusions: YouTube is insufficient source of information about DO and academic institutions have more responsibility in developing this situation and directing patients to reliable social media or Internet sources.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS PHILADELPHIAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SCS.0000000000007478en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectORTHODONTIC TREATMENTen_US
dc.subjectDistraction osteogenesis; Internet; social media; YouTubeen_US
dc.titleYouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2005en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2007en_US
Appears in Collections:Ortodonti

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.