Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3431
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAyranci, F.-
dc.contributor.authorBuyuk, S. K.-
dc.contributor.authorKahveci, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T10:59:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-06T10:59:12Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAyranci, F., Buyuk, SK., Kahveci, K. (2021). Are YouTube (TM) videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty?. Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 122(1), 39-42.Doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009en_US
dc.identifier.isbn2468-8509-
dc.identifier.isbn2468-7855-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000616263300009-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32360751-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3431-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories : Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of the information content of popular YouTube (TM) videos about genioplasty. Materials and methods: The keywords genioplasty, sliding genioplasty and genioplasty surgery were searched on YouTube (TM). It was filtered by the view count and the first 70 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Each video was scored as ranging from 0 to 8 point and the videos were classified as bad, poor, good and excellent content. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for statistical analysis. Intraobserver and inter-observer agreement were calculated Cohen's Kappa index. Results: The videos uploaded by the individuals were significantly higher total video duration (P < 0.001), number of comments (P = 0.048) and viewing rate (P = 0.036) than the others and the videos generally included their treatment journey. Most of the videos included bad information content. The number of likes (P = 0.037), dislikes (P = 0.037) and the interaction index (P = 0.026) of the bad information content videos were significantly higher than the others. The other parameters did not show a significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study would suggest that YouTube (TM) is not currently an appropriate source of information about genioplasty for the patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER AMSTERDAMen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGenioplasty; YouTube; Patient information; Social mediaen_US
dc.titleAre YouTube (TM) videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume122en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage39en_US
dc.identifier.endpage42en_US
Appears in Collections:Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.