Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3425
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTulga, Ayca-
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Husniye-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T10:57:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-06T10:57:43Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationTulga, A., Yildirim, H. (2021). Effect of different cleaning methods on resin bond strength of contaminated monolithic zirconia. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 35(23), 2547-2557.Doi:10.1080/01694243.2021.1892428en_US
dc.identifier.isbn0169-4243-
dc.identifier.isbn1568-5616-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1892428-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000626384100001-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3425-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories : Engineering, Chemical; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary; Mechanics Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : Engineering; Materials Science; Mechanicsen_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study evaluated the effects of cleaning methods on resin bond strength to contaminated monolithic zirconia. A total of 180 bar-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens (12 mm x 4 mm x 1.2 mm) were abraded with aluminum oxide and divided into nine groups (n = 10). The control group (Cnt) comprised non-contaminated or cleaned monolithic zirconia specimens. Half of the remaining samples were contaminated with saliva (S) and the other half with a silicone disclosing agent (F; Fit checker). The bonding surfaces of the specimens were cleaned with water (Sw and Fw), 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution (Sh and Fh), 37% phosphoric acid gel (Sa and Fa), or plasma treatment (Sp and Fp). The bars were luted end-to-end on the bonding surfaces using a self-adhesive resin cement with a custom-made stainless-steel mold. After 72 h of water storage, the bond strength was measured using a four-point bending test. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. The Cnt group showed the highest four-point bending strength (p < .05). There were no significant differences among the groups subjected to the cleaning methods, except the NaOCl groups (p > .05). These findings indicate that the cleaning protocol for saliva- or fit checker-contaminated monolithic zirconia ceramics must be taken into account to ensure zirconia-resin cement bond strength resistance. The plasma treatment that an alternative cleaning method for decontamination did not affect the bond strength between monolithic zirconia and resin cement.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD ABINGDONen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/01694243.2021.1892428en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectContamination; monolithic zirconia; plasma; cleaning proceduresen_US
dc.titleEffect of different cleaning methods on resin bond strength of contaminated monolithic zirconiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue23en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2547en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2557en_US
Appears in Collections:Protetik Diş Tedavisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.