Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/2529
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Hurkan-
dc.contributor.authorCetin, Orkun-
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Seda-
dc.contributor.authorVerit, Fatma Ferda-
dc.contributor.authorZebitay, Ali Galip-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T06:40:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-17T06:40:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/2529-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromised ovarian reserve and ovarian blood supply. Methods: This prospective study included 49 women aged between 21 and 36 years who had undergone a cesarean section for obstetric indications. Of these, 25 underwent uterine bilateral UAL to control intractable atonic PPH. The control group consisted of 24 women who had not undergone bilateral UAL. Standard clinical parameters, the results of color Doppler screening, and ovarian reserve markers were assessed in all participants at 6 months after surgery. The clinical parameters included age, parity, cycle history, body mass index, and previous medication and/or surgery. Color Doppler screening findings included the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) for both the uterine and ovarian arteries. The ovarian reserve markers included day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, antral follicle count, and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels. Results: There were no significant differences in the ovarian reserve markers of day 3 FSH levels, antral follicle count, and AMH levels between the study and control groups (p>0.05 for all). In addition, no significant differences were observed in the PI and RI indices of the uterine and ovarian arteries (p>0.05 for all). Conclusion: In this study, we showed that bilateral UAL had no negative effects on ovarian reserve or ovarian blood supply, so this treatment should be used as a fertility preservation technique to avoid hysterectomy in patients experiencing PPH.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKOREAN SOC REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, CHEIL MED RESEARCH INST BLDG 2F, CHEIL GENREAL HOSP, KWANDONG UNIV, COLL MED, SEOUL, 100-380, SOUTH KOREAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOvarian blood flow; Ovarian reserve; Uterine artery ligation; Uterine blood flowen_US
dc.titleDoes bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE-CERMen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage30en_US
dc.identifier.endpage35en_US
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.