Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1979
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmetbayik, Seyit-
dc.contributor.authorAladal, Murat-
dc.contributor.authorBayramoglu, Gulcin-
dc.contributor.authorCetinkol, Yeliz-
dc.contributor.authorCetinonarer, Pelin-
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Metin-
dc.contributor.authorDurmaz, Suleyman-
dc.contributor.authorGunes, Hayati-
dc.contributor.authorKeremcalgin, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMengeloglu, Zafer-
dc.contributor.authorMilletli, Fikriye-
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Metin-
dc.contributor.authorOzlemkalayci, Hacer-
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Nevzat-
dc.contributor.authorYanik, Keramettin-
dc.contributor.authorYula, Erkan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T11:39:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T11:39:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.19193/0393-6384_2018_2_63-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1979-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The increasing antibiotic resistance of staphylococci, an important factor among societal and hospital-sourced infection factors, reduces the treatment choices available. Fusidic acid (FA), the use of which has recently come to the agenda again, is thought to form a new alternative treatment for staphylococci infections. The aim of our study is to identify the FA resistance situation at certain centers compared to generally increasing antibiotic resistance, to present epidemiological data on new antibiotherapy methods and to aid in treatment planning. Materials and methods: With this aim we determined and compared the susceptibility of 2018 Staphylococcus aureus and 5242 Coagulase negative Staphylococci strains obtained at 11 centers in different regions of our country against FA, oxacillin, penicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin. Results: The Coagulase negative Staphylococci strains were determined to be more resistant to all antibiotics compared to S. aureus strains. When the means of all centers are examined, FA resistance was found in 7.1% of S. aureus strains and 55.1% of Coagulase negative Staphylococci strains. Of all antibiotics for both S. aureus and Coagulase negative Staphylococci strains the antibiotic that strains were most susceptible to was trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, while the antibiotic that most were resistant to was penicillin. Conclusion: In light of these findings, with high susceptibility of 92.9% for S. aureus strains to FA, it appears to be a good alternative treatment choice for S. aureus infections. Due to high resistance rates of methicillin-resistant Coagulase negative Staphylococci sourced infections, before treatment it is necessary to perform an antibiotic susceptibility test. We believe that broader scale and more comprehensive studies will provide guidance in planning treatment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCARBONE EDITORE, VIA QUINTINO SELLA, 68, PALERMO, 90139, ITALYen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.19193/0393-6384_2018_2_63en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectThalasemia trait; iron deficiency anemia; differentiating indexen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF FUSIDIC ACID SUSCEPTIBILITY OF STAPHYLOCOCCI: A MULTICENTER STUDYen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEAen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-3471-4768en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-4940-4498en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage397en_US
dc.identifier.endpage402en_US
Appears in Collections:Temel Tıp Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.