Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1949
Title: The Prevalence of Mixed Genotype Infections in Turkish Patients with Hepatitis C: a Multicentered Assessment
Authors: Akyar, Isin
Altindis, Mustafa
Cetinkol, Yeliz
Gokahmetoglu, Selma
Kaleli, Ilknur
Kulah, Canan
Sayiner, Arzu
Ordu Üniversitesi
Keywords: HCV; genotypes; mixed genotypes; Turkey; multicenter
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: CLIN LAB PUBL, IM BREITSPIEL 15, HEIDELBERG, D-69126, GERMANY
Citation: Canan Kulah, Mustafa Altındis, Işın Akyar, Selma Gökahmetoğlu, Arzu Sayiner, İlknur Kaleli, Işıl Fidan, İmre Altuğlu, Faruk Aydın, Aynur Topkaya, Tercan Us, Duygu Fındık, Mehmet Özdemir, Elif Öztürk, Seda Tezcan Ülger, Tekin Karsligil, Yeşim Çekin, Sebahat Aksaray, Emel Uzunoğlu, Osman Aktaş, Hakan Uslu, Yeliz Çinkinkol, Ayşe Semra Güreşçi, Gulfem Ece, Hande Toptan, Mehmet Köroğlu, Fusun Comert; Hepatit C'li Türk Hastalarda Karışık Genotip Enfeksiyonlarının Sıklığı: Çok Merkezli Bir Değerlendirme;CLINICAL LABORATORY 2019
Abstract: Background: HCV virus infections are one of the major health problems in the world that can cause cirrhosis and liver cancer at a higher rate than other hepatitis data. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of mixed infections with different HCV genotypes in Turkey and also to evaluate the current HCV genot pe and subtype distributions by a multicentered assessment. Methods: The HCV genotype data of 17,578 hepatitis C patients collected from 23 centers from different geographic regions covering all Turkey were collected. The data included information about the HCV genotypes in the last 10 years (bail een 2007 and 2016), demographic properties of the patients and the methods/systems used to determine the genotypes. Results: Two hundred twenty-eight of the patients (1.3%) had mixed genotype. The most common mixed genotype combination was 1b + 4 (0.83%) followed by 1a + 1b (0.26%). Genotype distribution varies according to geographical regions. However, genotype 1 (82.92%) was the most common genotype in all regions and all years. This was followed by genotype 3 (7.07%) and genotype 4 (5.43%). A variety of methods were used by the centers including sequencing, pyrosequencing, real-time PCR, in-house RFLP, reverse hybridization (LIPA), and hybridization. Conclusions: Infection with mixed HCV genotypes in Turkey is uncommon. Genotype distribution varies according to geographic regions; the most common genotype 1 is encountered all oN er the country, while genotypes 3 and 4 are only in some of the centers. Since there is limited information about mixed HCV infection, further investigations are needed to determine the clinical importance of mixed HCV infection.
URI: http://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180824
http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1949
Appears in Collections:Temel Tıp Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.