Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1667
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBalli, Umut-
dc.contributor.authorBaris, Emre-
dc.contributor.authorDede, Figen Ongoz-
dc.contributor.authorDurmuslar, Mustafa Cenk-
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Sevil Altindag-
dc.contributor.authorKurkcu, Mehmet-
dc.contributor.authorMisir, Ahmet Ferhat-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:58:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:58:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002873-
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/Fulltext/2016/09000/Histological_Evaluation_of_the_Effect_of.25.aspx-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1667-
dc.description.abstractObjectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of concentrated growth factors (CGF) on the healing of peri-implant bone defects in an animal model.Study Design:Twenty 4-month-old New Zealand White rabbits, each with an average weight of 3.5kg, were used in this blinded, prospective, experimental study. Two implants were placed and 2 peri-impant defects were prepared in each rabbit tibia. Bone defects were created monocortically in the tibia of each rabbit using a trephine burr with a diameter of 8mm. The implants were installed in each hole. The rabbits were divided into 4 groups: in group E, the defect was left empty; in group CGF, the defects were filled only with CGF; in group AB, the defects were filled with autogenous bone; and in group AB+CGF, the defects were filled with autogenous bone and CGF. The animals were euthanized at week 8 postimplantation. All implants from the 20 animals were fixed in 10% formalin and evaluated histomorphometrically.Results:The mean defect area was highest in group E and lowest in group CGF+AB (P<0.05). The area of the defect differed significantly between groups AB and CGF+AB (P<0.05), but not between groups CGF and E. Implant-to-bone contact was lowest in group E. In the defect areas of groups CGF, AB and CGF+AB, a small amount of new bone formed around the implant.Conclusions:In this animal model of a peri-implant bone defect, restoration was achieved using a combination of autogenous bone and CGF. Further studies are needed to determine the behavior of CGF when used in the repair of bone defects in humans.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 USAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SCS.0000000000002873en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutogenous bone graft; concentrated growth factors (CGF); dental implanten_US
dc.subjectPLATELET-RICH PLASMA; HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; EXTRACTION SOCKETS; IMPLANTS; FIBRIN; REGENERATION; CELLS; PARTICULATE; ADJACENT; DEFECTSen_US
dc.titleHistological Evaluation of the Effect of Concentrated Growth Factor on Bone Healingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-4211-3359en_US
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1494en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1497en_US
Appears in Collections:Periodontoloji

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.