Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1647
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBelduz, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBelduz, N.-
dc.contributor.authorKamburoglu, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKara, C.-
dc.contributor.authorTosun, I.-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:53:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:53:34Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.198388-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.njcponline.com/article.asp?issn=1119-3077;year=2017;volume=20;issue=3;spage=355;epage=360;aulast=Beld%FCz-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1647-
dc.description.abstractAims: Candida adhesion to any oral substrata is the first and essential stage in forming a pathogenic fungal biofilm. In general, yeast cells have remarkable potential to adhere to host surfaces, such as teeth or mucosa, and to artificial, nonbiological surfaces, such as restorative dental materials. This study compared the susceptibility of six dental restorative materials to Candida albicans adhesion. Materials and methods: Cylindrical samples of each material were made according to the manufacturers' instructions. The antifungal effect of the samples on C. albicans was determined with the disc-diffusion method. The samples were put in plates with sterile Mueller Hinton and Sabouraud dextrose agar previously seeded with C. albicans. After the incubation period, the inhibition zone around each sample was evaluated. To evaluate the biofilm formation, the XTT technique and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used. Results: No inhibition zone was observed around the samples. According to the XTT assays, the amalgam samples revealed the lowest quantity of biofilm formation (P > 0.001). The highest median XTT values, significantly higher than the other materials (P < 0.001), were found for the composite and the compomer samples. Within the SEM examination, the amount of candidal growth was significantly lower on the resin-modified glass ionomer and glass-ionomer cement samples. The compomer and the composite samples showed more candidal adhesion. Conclusion: This finding emphasizes the use of glass ionomer restorative cements and amalgam to reduce C. albicans adhesion to dental restorative materials especially in people with weakened immune systems, neutropenia, and cancer.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD, B-9, KANARA BUSINESS CENTRE, OFF LINK RD, GHAKTOPAR-E, MUMBAI, 400075, INDIAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/1119-3077.198388en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdherence; biofilm; biofilm vitality; Candida albicansen_US
dc.subjectGLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS; IN-VITRO; STREPTOCOCCUS-MUTANS; ACRYLIC SURFACES; FREE-ENERGY; ADHERENCE; BACTERIAL; ROUGHNESS; RESINS; COLONIZATIONen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Candida Albicans Biofilm Formation on Various Dental Restorative Material Surfacesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalNIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-5356-3665en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-3681-6143en_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage355en_US
dc.identifier.endpage360en_US
Appears in Collections:Pedodonti

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.