Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1599
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuyuk, S. K.-
dc.contributor.authorCandirli, C.-
dc.contributor.authorCantekin, K.-
dc.contributor.authorCelikoglu, M.-
dc.contributor.authorSekerci, A. E.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:40:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:40:42Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.39.2.t623u7495h07522r-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1599-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the frequency of maxillary dental anomalies in patients affected by unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip with palate and to determine whether statistical differences were present or not between cleft and normal sides in UCLP group by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In addition, the frequency of those dental anomalies was compared with previous studies presenting the same population without cleft Study Design: Fifty non-syndromic patients affected by UCLP (28 patients) and BCLP (22 patients) were selected for analysis of dental anomalies by means of CBCT. The frequency of maxillary dental anomalies including tooth agenesis, microdontia of lateral incisor, ectopic eruption and impaction of canine and supernumerary tooth were examined. Pearson chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed for statistical comparisons. Results: All patients affected by UCLP and BCLP were found to have at least one maxillary dental anomaly. The most frequently observed dental anomaly was tooth agenesis (92.5% and 86.4%, respectively) in UCLP and BCLP groups. Tooth agenesis and canine impaction were observed more commonly in the cleft side (75.0% and 35.7%, respectively) than in the normal side (57.1% and 14.3%, respectively) in UCLP group (p>0.05). All dental anomalies were found to be higher in both cleft groups than in general populations not affected by cleft. Conclusion: Since patients affected by UCLP and BCLP had at least one dental anomaly and higher dental anomaly frequency as compared to patients without cleft, those patients should be examined carefully prior to orthodontic treatment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJOURNAL PEDODONTICS INC5724 HIGHWAY 280 EAST, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35242en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.17796/jcpd.39.2.t623u7495h07522ren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAND/OR PALATELATERAL INCISORSPERMANENT TEETHPOPULATIONCHILDRENABNORMALITIESPREVALENCEHYPODONTIADENTITIONen_US
dc.subjectDental anomalycleft lipcleft palatecone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.titleMaxillary Dental Anomalies in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-3269-8610en_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage183en_US
dc.identifier.endpage186en_US
Appears in Collections:Ortodonti

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.