Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1587
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Cangul-
dc.contributor.authorSariyilmaz, Evren-
dc.contributor.authorSariyilmaz, Oznur-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:37:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:37:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.009-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0099239916306136?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0099239916306136%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&referrer=-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1587-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementary use of XP-endo Finisher file, passive ultrasonic activation (PUI), EndoActivator (EA), and CanalBrush (CB) on the removal of calcium hydroxide (CH) paste from simulated internal resorption cavities. Methods: The root canals of 110 extracted single-rooted teeth with straight canals were prepared up to size 50. The specimens were split longitudinally, and standardized internal resorption cavities were prepared with burs. The cavities and root canals were filled with CH paste. The specimens were divided into 5 groups as follows: XP-endo Finisher, EA, PUI, CB, and syringe irrigation (SI). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes, respectively. Apart from the SI group, both solutions were activated by using tested techniques for 1 minute. The quantity of CH remnants on resorption cavities was scored. Data were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: XP-endo Finisher and PUI removed significantly more CH than SI, EA, and CB (P <.05), showing no significant difference between them (P>.05). Differences among SI, EA, and CB were also non-significant (P>.05). Conclusions: None of the tested techniques render the simulated internal resorption cavities free of CH debris. XP-endo Finisher and PUI were superior to SI, CB, and EA.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.009en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCalcium hydroxide; CanalBrush; EndoActivator; passive ultrasonic activation; XP-endo Finisheren_US
dc.subjectROOT RESORPTION; CANAL SEALERS; APICAL 3RD; IN-VITRO; IRRIGATION; DIAGNOSISen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of XP-endo Finisher File in Removing Calcium Hydroxide from Simulated Internal Resorption Cavityen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-1711-7056en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-4263-6851en_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage126en_US
dc.identifier.endpage130en_US
Appears in Collections:Endodonti

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.