Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1552
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAras, Mutan Hamdi-
dc.contributor.authorAyranci, Ferhat-
dc.contributor.authorAyranci, Leyla Benan-
dc.contributor.authorOzdogan, Alper-
dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Serkan-
dc.contributor.authorPeker, Mutlunur Onder-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:25:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:25:54Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2517-6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1552-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present work was to measure the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth that were apicoected with different procedures. Seventy-two extracted human maxillary anterior teeth were included in this study. The specimens were randomly assigned to three main groups according to the apical surgery procedures and then two subgroups according to the irrigation protocols during root canal treatment and total of six groups were obtained (n=12). Group 1: served as a control and apical surgery process was not performed in this group. Group 2: apical surgery process was performed with tungsten carbide fissure bur Group 3: apical surgery process was performed with Er:YAG laser. Subgroup a: In this group, the specimens were irrigated with %5 NaOCl. Subgroup b: 15% EDTA solution was filled into the root canal and then agitated using a 1.5W/100Hz diode laser. The specimens were filled and mounted in acrylic resin blocks and compression strength test was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. The statistical analysis revealed that there were no statistical significant differences between apical surgery procedures (groups 1, 2, and 3) (p<0.05). Apical resection procedures did not affect the fracture resistance Significant differences were determined between the subgroups (p<0.05). Agitation of the EDTA with the diode laser reduced the fracture resistance of the specimens. The different canal irrigation techniques altered resistance to fracture; however, apical surgery procedures did not altered the resistance to fracture when compared with the control group.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGER LONDON LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, 6TH FLOOR, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLANDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10103-018-2517-6en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectApicoectomy; Lasers; Er:YAG; EDTAen_US
dc.titleResistance to vertical root fracture of apicoected teeth using different devices during two root canal irrigation proceduresen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalLASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-6410-865Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1685en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1691en_US
Appears in Collections:Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.