Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1551
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Oguzhan-
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdar, Ibrahim Sevki-
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Sacide-
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Suayip Burak-
dc.contributor.authorYasa, Yasin-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Sevcihan Gunen-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:25:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:25:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1412498-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1551-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study evaluated the prevalence and morphological characteristics of the superior semicircular canal (SSCC) in cleft lip and palate (CUP) patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: CBCT images of 53CL/P patients (28 males and 25 females) and a control group of 76 patients (42 males and 34 females) were evaluated. Retrospectively, 258 temporal bone images from 129 patients were evaluated in terms of SSCC morphology and divided into a normal pattern (0.6-1.7mm in thickness), a papyraceous pattern (<0.5mm), a thick pattern (>1.8mm), a pneumatized pattern and dehiscent. The chi-squared test was used to compare differences among semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) patterns in the CL/P and control groups; p <.05 was taken to reflect statistical significance. Results: The characteristics of the SSCC were evaluated on CBCT images in patients with CL/P and controls. In total, 158 (61%) cases were normal (0.6-1.7mm in thickness), 31 (12%) papyraceous (<0.5 mm), 8 (3%) thick, and 34 (13%) pneumatized. SSCD was observed in 27 (11%) cases. Statistically significant differences between the CL/P and control groups were evident in terms of SSCC morphology (p<.001). Conclusions: SSCD should be considered if a CL/P patient exhibits a vestibular system deficiency. Oral and maxillofacial radiologists should pay attention to SSCD when interpreting CBCT images. Future studies should use high-level spatial resolution CBCT to focus on cleft site and SSCC morphology in larger patient populations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLANDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/00016357.2017.1412498en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSemicircular canal morphology; cone beam computed tomography; cleft lip and palateen_US
dc.titleCone beam computed tomography imaging of superior semicircular canal morphology: a retrospective comparison of cleft lip/palate patients and normal controlsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICAen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-5036-9867en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-5036-9867en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-6884-9674en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-4388-2125en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-2552-0187en_US
dc.identifier.volume76en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage247en_US
dc.identifier.endpage252en_US
Appears in Collections:Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.