Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1527
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAyranci, Ferhat-
dc.contributor.authorGundogdu, Betul-
dc.contributor.authorGungormus, Metin-
dc.contributor.authorOmezli, Mehmet Melih-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:19:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:19:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.33569-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706848/-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1527-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Increasing sinus pneumatization and the accompanying alveolar bone resorption complicate dental implant placement. This problem can be overcome today by raising the maxillary sinus floor with graft materials. Bisphosphonates are commonly used to accelerate the recovery of the graft materials and to prevent resorption. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether systemic administration of a bisphosphonate (alendronate) would improve new bone formation and reduce fibrous tissue formation over a 6-week follow-up in rabbits treated with two different grafting materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Materials and Methods: This experimental animal study was conducted at the Experimental Medical Application and Research Center at Erzurum/Turkey. Twelve New Zealand rabbits, each weighing between 2.7 and 3.3 kg, were used. Twenty-four maxillary sinus floor elevation operations were performed, two on each animal (n = 24). Each elevation was repaired with either deproteinized bovine bone (xenograft) or autogenous bone graft obtained from the iliac crest. Both groups were divided into 2 subgroups: saline-treated and alendronate-treated. All groups underwent the same surgical procedures and evaluation, and were sacrificed at the 6th postoperative week. Sinuses augmented with deproteinized bovine bone (xenograft) and autogenous bone graft were examined histopathologically and histomorphometrically. Results: At 6 weeks, the bone area was significantly larger in the Xenograft-Alendronate group (33.0%+/- 5.0%) than in the Xenograft-Saline group (20.8%+/- 4.9%) and the bonearea was significantly larger in the Autogenous-Alendronate group (43.3%+/- 3.8%) than in the Autogenous-Saline group (37.5%+/- 6.6%) (P = 0.001). The histomorphometric and histopathological results consistently showed that alendronate stimulated bone formation and reduced fibrous tissue formation in maxillary sinus augmentation grafts, especially in the deproteinized bovine bone group (xenograft). Conclusions: Alendronate may be considered a therapeutic option for improving the bone formation process and reducing resorption in different bone grafting procedures. Further detailed studies should focus on dosage and time-dependent effects of alendronate on bone remodeling.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherZAMENSALAMATI PUBL COKHORASAN, MASHHAD, SANABAD-EBNE SINA ST, MASHHAD 00000, IRANen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5812/ircmj.33569en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBisphosphonateAlendronateSinusMaxillaryen_US
dc.subjectDIFFERENTIATION FACTOR-5 RHGDF-5GOETTINGEN MINIATURE PIGRECOMBINANT HUMAN GROWTHAUTOGENOUS BONE-GRAFTPLATELET-RICH PLASMAFLOOR AUGMENTATIONDISTRACTION OSTEOGENESISSYSTEMIC ALENDRONATEPREVENTS RESORPTIONCLINICAL-EVALUATIONen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Alendronate on Various Graft Materials Used in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Rabbit Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalIRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNALen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-7126-5696en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-6606-6593en_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
Appears in Collections:Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.