DSpace Repository

YouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Coban, Gokhan
dc.contributor.author Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-06T11:09:05Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-06T11:09:05Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Coban, G., Buyuk, SK. (2021). YouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(6), 2005-2007.Doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007478 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 1049-2275
dc.identifier.isbn 1536-3732
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007478
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000691810100049
dc.identifier.uri https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33534330
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3478
dc.description WoS Categories : Surgery Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : Surgery en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos about distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the craniofacial region. Methods: The term distraction osteogenesis was searched on YouTube. After sorting by relevance, 80 videos were selected from 128 search results for analysis of general characteristics, primary purpose, information reliability, audiovisual quality, global quality scale (GQS), and viewers' interaction index. Viewing rate formulae were calculated for each YouTube video. The Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. Results: We classified 22 (27.5%) of the 80 videos as moderate/high-content and 58 (72.5%) as low-content. Most YouTube videos about DO were uploaded by doctors (45%) and information about DO was the most covered topic (61%). Videos from commercial companies had significantly higher GQS scores than videos uploaded by other groups (P = 0.040). In low-information content videos, GQS was highly correlated with the number of likes, whereas in moderate/high-content videos it was highly correlated with viewing rates. Conclusions: YouTube is insufficient source of information about DO and academic institutions have more responsibility in developing this situation and directing patients to reliable social media or Internet sources. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS PHILADELPHIA en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007478 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT en_US
dc.subject Distraction osteogenesis; Internet; social media; YouTube en_US
dc.title YouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.identifier.volume 32 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 6 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 2005 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 2007 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account