DSpace Repository

Are YouTube (TM) videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ayranci, F.
dc.contributor.author Buyuk, S. K.
dc.contributor.author Kahveci, K.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-06T10:59:12Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-06T10:59:12Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Ayranci, F., Buyuk, SK., Kahveci, K. (2021). Are YouTube (TM) videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty?. Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 122(1), 39-42.Doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 2468-8509
dc.identifier.isbn 2468-7855
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009
dc.identifier.uri https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000616263300009
dc.identifier.uri https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32360751
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3431
dc.description WoS Categories : Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of the information content of popular YouTube (TM) videos about genioplasty. Materials and methods: The keywords genioplasty, sliding genioplasty and genioplasty surgery were searched on YouTube (TM). It was filtered by the view count and the first 70 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Each video was scored as ranging from 0 to 8 point and the videos were classified as bad, poor, good and excellent content. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for statistical analysis. Intraobserver and inter-observer agreement were calculated Cohen's Kappa index. Results: The videos uploaded by the individuals were significantly higher total video duration (P < 0.001), number of comments (P = 0.048) and viewing rate (P = 0.036) than the others and the videos generally included their treatment journey. Most of the videos included bad information content. The number of likes (P = 0.037), dislikes (P = 0.037) and the interaction index (P = 0.026) of the bad information content videos were significantly higher than the others. The other parameters did not show a significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study would suggest that YouTube (TM) is not currently an appropriate source of information about genioplasty for the patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher ELSEVIER AMSTERDAM en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.04.009 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Genioplasty; YouTube; Patient information; Social media en_US
dc.title Are YouTube (TM) videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty? en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.identifier.volume 122 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 39 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 42 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account