DSpace Repository

Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Acar, Ahmet Hueseyin
dc.contributor.author Alan, Hilal
dc.contributor.author Asutay, Fatih
dc.contributor.author Guler, Cigdem
dc.contributor.author Ozgur, Cem
dc.contributor.author Vardi, Nigar
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-16T05:53:21Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-16T05:53:21Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932
dc.identifier.uri https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/Fulltext/2016/10000/Is_More_Cortical_Bone_Decortication_Effective_on.68.aspx
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1646
dc.description.abstract This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 USA en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Bone decortication rate; guided bone augmentation; hydroxyapatite; beta-tricalcium phosphate; titanium membrane en_US
dc.subject MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; AUTOGENOUS BLOCK BONE; PLATELET-RICH FIBRIN; RABBIT CALVARIUM; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBULAR DEFECTS; TITANIUM BARRIER; RECIPIENT BED; REGENERATION; RECONSTRUCTION en_US
dc.title Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation? en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-2581-9050 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 27 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 7 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 1879 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 1883 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account