dc.contributor.author |
Acar, Ahmet Hueseyin |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Alan, Hilal |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Asutay, Fatih |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Guler, Cigdem |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ozgur, Cem |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Vardi, Nigar |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-08-16T05:53:21Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-08-16T05:53:21Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/Fulltext/2016/10000/Is_More_Cortical_Bone_Decortication_Effective_on.68.aspx |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1646 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 USA |
en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932 |
en_US |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Bone decortication rate; guided bone augmentation; hydroxyapatite; beta-tricalcium phosphate; titanium membrane |
en_US |
dc.subject |
MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; AUTOGENOUS BLOCK BONE; PLATELET-RICH FIBRIN; RABBIT CALVARIUM; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBULAR DEFECTS; TITANIUM BARRIER; RECIPIENT BED; REGENERATION; RECONSTRUCTION |
en_US |
dc.title |
Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation? |
en_US |
dc.type |
article |
en_US |
dc.relation.journal |
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY |
en_US |
dc.contributor.department |
Ordu Üniversitesi |
en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID |
0000-0002-2581-9050 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.volume |
27 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issue |
7 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage |
1879 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage |
1883 |
en_US |