DSpace Repository

Investigation of Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects of Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and Jasper Jumper Appliances in Class II Malocclusions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Arslan, Akif
dc.contributor.author Benkli, Yasin A.
dc.contributor.author Buyuk, S. Kutalmis
dc.contributor.author Genc, Esra
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-16T05:47:53Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-16T05:47:53Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.uri https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332589495_Investigation_of_Dentoskeletal_and_Soft_Tissue_Effects_of_Forsus_Fatigue_Resistant_Device_and_Jasper_Jumper_Appliances_in_Class_II_Malocclusions
dc.identifier.uri http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1625
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FRD) and Jasper Jumper appliances in correction of Class II malocclusion. Methods: 33 patients were divided into two groups as treated with Forsus FRD appliance (18 subjects: 8 females, 10 males-mean age: 15.79 +/- 1.50 years) and treated with Jasper Jumper appliance (15 subjects: 9 females, 6 males-mean age: 16.12 +/- 1.58 years), randomly. Initial and final lateral cephalometric radiographies were traced and analyzed digitally. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: In the assessment of the skeletal parameters, both two groups had similar outcomes and there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05). In both groups ANB, Convexity angles and Wits values decreased and maxillomandibular discrepancy improved on sagittal plan. Maxillary incisors were proclined in Forsus FRD group, and maxillary incisors were retroclined in Jasper Jumper treated group and there was a statistically significant difference between groups (p<0.05). In the assessment of mandibular incisor, proclination occurred in both two groups. In the soft tissue evaluation, facial profile was improved through upper lip retrusion and lower lip protrusion and there were no statistically significant differences between groups in these values (p>0.05). Conclusion: The skeletal and soft tissue effects of the Forsus FRD and Jasper Jumper appliances were similar while there were some differences in dental effects. Some factors such as skeletal age, cephalometric values should be taken into consideration when making a choice about the fixed functional appliance. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher MARMARA UNIV, INST HEALTH SCIENCES, MARMARA U BASIBUYUK SAGLIK YERLESKESI, SAGLIK BILIMLERI ENSTITUSU MUDURLUGU, BASIBUYUK YOLU 9-3, ISTANBUL, 34854, TURKEY en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Class II malocclusion; fixed functional appliance; Jasper Jumper; Forsus FRD en_US
dc.title Investigation of Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects of Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and Jasper Jumper Appliances in Class II Malocclusions en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES en_US
dc.contributor.department Ordu Üniversitesi en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-0394-5961 en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0003-3269-8610 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 8 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 291 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 295 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account