Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4781
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guler, H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-20T13:44:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-20T13:44:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Yilmaz, H., Güler, H. (2023). Explaining Skeletal System Anatomy with Classical Method, Video Assisted Method and 3D Imaging Techniques and Comparison of Learning Levels Between Methods. Int. J. Morphol., 41(4), 1107-1111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0717-9502 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0717-9367 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001048344800019 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4781 | - |
dc.description | WoS Categories: Anatomy & Morphology | en_US |
dc.description | Web of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) | en_US |
dc.description | Research Areas: Anatomy & Morphology | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this research is to introduce the ideal lecture technique to the literature by explaining the anatomy of the skeletal system using the classical method, video-assisted method and 3D imaging techniques. The research was carried out with 180 students. The number of samples was determined by power analysis (a=0.05,b=0.20, effect size=0.25). Participants were pre-screened and divided into 4 groups with the closest group mean (group 1: control group: the group that did not take anatomy lessons, group 2: video-assisted anatomy education, group 3: 3D anatomy course, group 4: classical anatomy education group). The courses in the training groups were organised as 4 hours/day, 2 days/week for 5 weeks. At the end of the course, the students were re-examined and scaled to determine the difference in scores and self-efficacy between the groups. A one-way ANOVA test was performed because the data were normally distributed when comparing between groups. The mean scores were calculated as group 1=30.22 & PLUSMN;6.24, group 2=39.02 & PLUSMN;9.15, group 3=49.77 & PLUSMN;9.20 and group 4=59.28 & PLUSMN;8.95. In the post hoc comparison, in pairwise comparisons between all groups, the differences were highly significant (p<0.001). According to the results of the self-efficacy scale, the groups were ranked as group 4>group 3>group 2>group 1 (p<0.001). According to the results of this study, the laboratory method in skeletal anatomy teaching is the best alternative to 3D anatomy teaching. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | SOC CHILENA ANATOMIA-TEMUCO | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | KEY WORDS, Anatomy, Education, Skeletal System Anatomy, Video-assisted, 3D | en_US |
dc.title | Explaining Skeletal System Anatomy with Classical Method, Video Assisted Method and 3D Imaging Techniques and Comparison of Learning Levels Between Methods | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Ordu Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1107 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1111 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Temel Tıp Bilimleri |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.