Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, H.-
dc.contributor.authorGuler, H.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T13:44:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-20T13:44:05Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationYilmaz, H., Güler, H. (2023). Explaining Skeletal System Anatomy with Classical Method, Video Assisted Method and 3D Imaging Techniques and Comparison of Learning Levels Between Methods. Int. J. Morphol., 41(4), 1107-1111en_US
dc.identifier.issn0717-9502-
dc.identifier.issn0717-9367-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001048344800019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4781-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories: Anatomy & Morphologyen_US
dc.descriptionWeb of Science Index: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)en_US
dc.descriptionResearch Areas: Anatomy & Morphologyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this research is to introduce the ideal lecture technique to the literature by explaining the anatomy of the skeletal system using the classical method, video-assisted method and 3D imaging techniques. The research was carried out with 180 students. The number of samples was determined by power analysis (a=0.05,b=0.20, effect size=0.25). Participants were pre-screened and divided into 4 groups with the closest group mean (group 1: control group: the group that did not take anatomy lessons, group 2: video-assisted anatomy education, group 3: 3D anatomy course, group 4: classical anatomy education group). The courses in the training groups were organised as 4 hours/day, 2 days/week for 5 weeks. At the end of the course, the students were re-examined and scaled to determine the difference in scores and self-efficacy between the groups. A one-way ANOVA test was performed because the data were normally distributed when comparing between groups. The mean scores were calculated as group 1=30.22 & PLUSMN;6.24, group 2=39.02 & PLUSMN;9.15, group 3=49.77 & PLUSMN;9.20 and group 4=59.28 & PLUSMN;8.95. In the post hoc comparison, in pairwise comparisons between all groups, the differences were highly significant (p<0.001). According to the results of the self-efficacy scale, the groups were ranked as group 4>group 3>group 2>group 1 (p<0.001). According to the results of this study, the laboratory method in skeletal anatomy teaching is the best alternative to 3D anatomy teaching.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSOC CHILENA ANATOMIA-TEMUCOen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKEY WORDS, Anatomy, Education, Skeletal System Anatomy, Video-assisted, 3Den_US
dc.titleExplaining Skeletal System Anatomy with Classical Method, Video Assisted Method and 3D Imaging Techniques and Comparison of Learning Levels Between Methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1107en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1111en_US
Appears in Collections:Temel Tıp Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.