Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4529
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, Merve-
dc.contributor.authorBaglar, Serdar-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T11:24:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-15T11:24:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAydemir, M., Baglar, S. (2023). A Prospective-Randomized Study: The Impact of Four Different Caries Removal Method on Pain and Clinical Evaluations. J. DENT. INDONES., 30(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1429en_US
dc.identifier.issn1693-9697-
dc.identifier.issn2355-4800-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1429-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001022706200004-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4529-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineen_US
dc.descriptionWeb of Science Index: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)en_US
dc.descriptionResearch Areas: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: There are many different methods for removing caries. In this study, to evaluate four caries removal methods in terms of patient comfort and to evaluate the clinical success of restorations according to modified-USPHS criteria. Methods: In 31 patients with at least 4 Class II caries in their posterior teeth, 4 teeth were randomly divided into four groups and 4 different methods (conventional method, Carisolv, Papacarie, Er-Cr:YSGG Laser) were used for caries removal. Pain formation during caries removal was determined by FACE Pain Scale questionnaire. The restorations were controlled with Modified-USPHS criteria in 3-6-12 months period. Mann-Whitney U test for two-group comparisons, Kruskal Wallis H test for comparison of three or more groups, Wilcoxon Sign test was used to examine the changes according to time (p < 0.05). Results: A significant difference was found between conventional methods and alternative methods in terms of pain tolerance. In the 1-year clinical evaluation of the restorations, there was a significant decrease in the postoperative sensitivity in all groups. A significant difference was detected in Carisolv and laser groups between 6-months and 12-months for marginal coloration. A significant difference was found between the conventional and laser groups between 6-months and 12-months in terms of color match. Conclusion: The success of restorations, efficacy and efficiency of the methods used in the evaluation of all groups were found to be successful. In terms of patient comfort, all alternative methods gave positive results.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUNIV INDONESIA, FAC DENTISTRY-JAKARTA PUSATen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1429en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcaries removal, carisolv, Er-Cr, YSGG laser, FACE Pain Scale, papacarieen_US
dc.subjectHUMAN PRIMARY DENTIN, RESIN ADHESION, CARIOUS DENTIN, GARNET LASER, PERFORMANCE, SOUND, CARISOLV(TM), EXCAVATION, SYSTEMSen_US
dc.titleA Prospective-Randomized Study: The Impact of Four Different Caries Removal Method on Pain and Clinical Evaluationsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF DENTISTRY INDONESIAen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage23en_US
dc.identifier.endpage32en_US
Appears in Collections:Diş Hastalıkları veTedavisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.