Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4126
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFiskin, Cemile Solak-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T08:01:23Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-15T08:01:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationFiskin, CS. (2023). Inter-Port Evolutions and Prospects of Three Major Port Hubs in Europe: a Visualization Perspective Using Ternary Diagram Method. Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09553-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn1874-463X-
dc.identifier.issn1874-4621-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09553-8-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001122486100001-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/4126-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories: Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planningen_US
dc.descriptionWeb of Science Index: Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)en_US
dc.descriptionResearch Areas: Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administrationen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the recent decade, increasing vessel sizes, infrastructure developments, intermodal connections, and digital transformation again have raised questions about the development of container ports. This transformation is expected to continue to affect the port industry in the future. While the Port of Rotterdam is the busiest container port in Europe, its top-ranking place is under pressure, and competition between the top three ports has become fiercer. This contribution provides insights into the concentration, inequality and competition evolution of Europe's top three ports through several measurement methods and the ternary diagram. Several measurement methods are used to report the concentration, inequality, and competition of these ports. The study confirms that ternary diagram indicators and traditional measures reveal similar results. Findings also suggest that no port has a dominating position in this competitive port system, and these ports are engaging in efficient competition. SSA analysis indicates that the Port of Hamburg is the major loser in the last two periods; the Port of Rotterdam and Port of Antwerp are the major winners respectively in the last two periods. Moreover, the prospects are salient for a tendency towards concentration and inequality. The findings of the study provide insights and visualizations for policymakers, enabling them to gain a deeper understanding of the development and prospects of the three major port hubs in Europe.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGER-DORDRECHTen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s12061-023-09553-8en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTernary diagram, Concentration ratio, Port competition, Port system evolution, Forecastingen_US
dc.subjectCONTAINER THROUGHPUT, SYSTEM EVOLUTION, HONG-KONG, COMPETITION, FORECAST, COMPLEMENTARITY, MARKET, RANGEen_US
dc.titleInter-Port Evolutions and Prospects of Three Major Port Hubs in Europe: a Visualization Perspective Using Ternary Diagram Methoden_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAPPLIED SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND POLICYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
Appears in Collections:Denizcilik İşletmeleri Yönetimi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.