Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3496
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenli, Erdal-
dc.contributor.authorYuce, Ahmet-
dc.contributor.authorCirakoglu, Abdullah-
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Ibrahim-
dc.contributor.authorKadim, Nurullah-
dc.contributor.authorNalbant, Ismail-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T11:13:07Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-06T11:13:07Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationBenli, E., Yuce, A., Cirakoglu, A., Yazici, I., Kadim, N., Nalbant, I. (2022). Effect of targeted prophylaxis with rectal swab on complications after prostate biopsy: prospective randomized study. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 191(3), 1147-1152.Doi:10.1007/s11845-021-02723-yen_US
dc.identifier.isbn0021-1265-
dc.identifier.isbn1863-4362-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02723-y-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000677228100001-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34304346-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3496-
dc.descriptionWoS Categories : Medicine, General & Internal Web of Science Index : Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) Research Areas : General & Internal Medicineen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground For diagnosis of prostate cancer, prostate biopsy accompanied by TRUS is the current method applied today. Aim The aim of this study was to compare targeted antibiotic prophylaxis, chosen according to rectal swab results before the procedure, with routinely administered prophylaxis and to investigate the effect on infective complications. Methods The study included 140 patients with 12-quadrant prostate biopsy accompanied by TRUS in our hospital from 2018 to 2020. The first group had antibiotherapy prophylaxis administered according to the results of rectal swabs before the procedure. The second group had routine ciprofloxacin prophylaxis administered. Patients were followed prospectively for 1 month after the procedure. Results When the mean age, systemic diseases and distribution in both groups are examined, there was no significant difference observed. Fever (> 38.5 degrees C) was observed in 3 patients in the rectal swab group (4.3%), while it was identified in 10 people in the control group (14.1%) (p = 0.047). Major complications were observed in 3 people in the rectal swab group (4.3%) and in 7 people in the control group (9.9%) (p = 0.012). Conclusions The results of the study identified that routine administration of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis may be more effective in preventing infective complications compared to standard prophylaxis. Targeted prophylaxis is recommended for risky patients in the guidelines. However, the lack of difference between the groups in terms of age and comorbidities supports the need to administer targeted prophylaxis not just to risky patients but as well as routine practice.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGER LONDON LTD LONDONen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11845-021-02723-yen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectINFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTIONen_US
dc.subjectComplications; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Targeted prophylactic antibiotherapy; Transrectal ultrasonographyen_US
dc.titleEffect of targeted prophylaxis with rectal swab on complications after prostate biopsy: prospective randomized studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalIRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-8485-1424en_US
dc.identifier.volume191en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1147en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1152en_US
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.