Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3218
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDede, Dogu Omur-
dc.contributor.authorArmaganci, Arzu-
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Gozlem-
dc.contributor.authorCankaya, Soner-
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Ersan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T10:56:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-07T10:56:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.777114-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/3218-
dc.description.abstractPurpose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of different abutment materials and luting cements color on the final color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. Materials and methods. Ten A(2) shade IPS e.max Press disc shape all-ceramic specimens were prepared (11 x 1.5 mm). Three different shades (translucent, universal and white opaque) of disc shape luting cement specimens were prepared (11 x 0.2 mm). Three different (zirconium, gold-palladium and titanium) implant abutments and one composite resin disc shape background specimen were prepared at 11 mm diameter and appropriate thicknesses. All ceramic specimens colors were measured with each background and luting cement samples on a teflon mold. A digital spectrophotometer used for measurements and data recorded as CIE L(star)a(star)b(star) color co-ordinates. An optical fluid applied on to the samples to provide a good optical connection and measurements on the composite resin background was saved as the control group. Delta E values were calculated from the Delta L, Delta a and Delta b values between control and test groups and data were analyzed with one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and mean values were compared by the Tukey HSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results. One-way ANOVA of Delta L, Delta a, Delta b and Delta E values of control and test groups revealed significant differences for backgrounds and seldom for cement color groups (p the 0.05). Only zirconium implant abutment groups and gold palladium abutment with universal shade cement group were found to be clinically acceptable (Delta E <= 3.0). Conclusion. Using titanium or gold-palladium abutments for implant supported all ceramics will be esthetically questionable and white opaque cement will be helpful to mask the dark color of titanium abutment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLANDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3109/00016357.2013.777114en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectImplant abutment luting cement all ceramic color color differenceen_US
dc.titleInfluence of abutment material and luting cements color on the final color of all ceramicsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICAen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-8056-1892en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-1021-5702en_US
dc.identifier.volume71en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1570en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1578en_US
Appears in Collections:Temel Tıp Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.