Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/2933
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkin Arikan, Cigdem-
dc.contributor.authorDogruoz, Ebru-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-19T11:14:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-19T11:14:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.585774-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/2933-
dc.description.abstractThis research analyzed the two-category Item Response Theory (IRT) models as part of different ability estimation methods. The research was carried out in consideration of responses to 20 items under the Mathematics subtest of TEOG (National Transition from Primary to Secondary Education) exam by the 8th-grade students in 2015-2016. The study group consisted of 400 students who were randomly selected from the students participated in the TEOG exam. Ability estimations and standard error values for these estimations were calculated based on the data. These estimations were compared by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements According to the research findings; it was revealed that the four-parameter logistic (4PL) item model fit better. In terms of ability estimation methods, the accuracy of Weighted Likelihood Estimation (WLE) was higher than Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) and Expected A Posteriori (EAP). WLE and MAP ability estimation model gave lower standard error values compared to the 4PL and 3PL model, respectively. The highest marginal reliability coefficient value for the 3PL model was calculated using estimations made according to MAP while estimations made according to WLE were used for the 4PL model. According to the research findings, it was concluded that the accuracy of ability scores obtained by the WLE estimation method under the 4PL model was higher.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDERGIPARK AKAD, MUSTAFA KEMAL MAHALLESI, DUMLUPINAR BULVARI, 2151 CADDE, NO 154 ODTU KARSISI, SANKAYA, ANKARA, 06510, TURKEYen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.9779/pauefd.585774en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectability estimation methods; item response theory; 3 PLM; 4PLMen_US
dc.subjectMAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; THEORY MODELS; PARAMETERS; IRTen_US
dc.titleComparison of Different Ability Estimation Methods Based on 3 and 4PL Item Response Theoryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalPAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-5255-8792en_US
dc.identifier.issue50en_US
dc.identifier.startpage50en_US
dc.identifier.endpage69en_US
Appears in Collections:Eğitim Bilimleri

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.