Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1710
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaleli, Necati-
dc.contributor.authorKucukekenci, Ahmet Serkan-
dc.contributor.authorUral, Cagri-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T06:10:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T06:10:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391319300253?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1710-
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Laser sintering has become a common manufacturing technique in the fabrication of metal-ceramic restorations. The layer thickness of the sintering process may affect the surface morphology and hence the porcelain bond strength. However, limited information is available on the effect of layer thickness on porcelain bond strength. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the porcelain bond strength of direct metal laser-melted (DMLM) cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) metal frameworks sintered with 25-mu m and 50-iim layer thicknesses. Material and methods. Thirty metal frameworks (n=10) were fabricated by using the lost-wax technique (group C [control]), DMLM with a 25-mu m layer thickness (group L25), and DMLM with a 50-mu m layer thickness (group L50) according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9693-1. The surface roughness of 1 metal specimen from each group was analyzed by atomic force microscopy. After porcelain firing, a 3-point bend test was applied to each metal-ceramic specimen as in ISO 9693-1. In addition, 1 metal framework from each group was prepared and examined by scanning electron microscopy to evaluate surface morphology. Data were analyzed statistically by using 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey honestly significant difference tests (alpha=.05). Results. Group C and group L25 showed significantly higher (P<.001) mean porcelain bond strength values than group L50, and no significant bond strength difference was found between groups C and L25. All groups generally exhibited an adhesive type of failure. Conclusions. The results indicate that layer thickness may affect the porcelain bond strength of DMLM metal frameworks.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIER, 360 PARK AVENUE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.016en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES; DENTAL ALLOYS; SHEAR; CAST; RESTORATIONS; FABRICATION; ADHERENCE; SYSTEMS; POWDERS; FUTUREen_US
dc.titleThe effect of layer thickness on the porcelain bond strength of laser-sintered metal frameworksen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-5613-2027en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-6628-0939en_US
dc.identifier.volume122en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage76en_US
dc.identifier.endpage81en_US
Appears in Collections:Protetik Diş Tedavisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.