Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1688
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDede, Dogu Omur-
dc.contributor.authorKoroglu, Aysegul-
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Onur-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Burak-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T06:04:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T06:04:59Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.007-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239131630004X?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1688-
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. The effects of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of denture base materials are unknown. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing methods on the surface roughness and color stability of denture base materials. Material and methods. A total of 120 specimens were fabricated from 2 poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and 1 polyamide denture base materials and divided into 4 groups (n=10 in each group) according to the applied surface treatment procedure: conventional polishing (control) and 3 surface sealant coupling methods. Surface roughness average (R-a) values were measured using a profilometer. Color parameters were measured using a spectrophotometer before and after being stained with coffee. Color differences (CIEDE 2000 [Delta E-00]) were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey honest significant difference test (alpha=.05). Results. No statistically significant difference were found between surface roughness values of the control and those of the specimens treated using a surface sealant agent (P>.05). The highest color difference was calculated for the polyamide control group. Statistically significant differences were found between the control group and the group treated with the polyamide surface sealant agent (P<.05). Conclusions. All specimens had a surface roughness value higher than the plaque accumulation threshold (0.20 mu m). The color changes observed were clinically unacceptable, except for conventionally polished and one type of surface sealant applied microwave polymerized PMMA denture base material.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIER, 360 PARK AVENUE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.007en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPOLISHING TECHNIQUES; ACRYLIC RESINS; IN-VITRO; STREPTOCOCCUS-ORALIS; POLYMERIZATION; POLYAMIDE; CYCLES; TEETHen_US
dc.titleEffect of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of denture base materialsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-7101-363Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-8018-6946en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-1021-5702en_US
dc.identifier.volume116en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage610en_US
dc.identifier.endpage616en_US
Appears in Collections:Protetik Diş Tedavisi

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.