Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1646
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Ahmet Hueseyin-
dc.contributor.authorAlan, Hilal-
dc.contributor.authorAsutay, Fatih-
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Cigdem-
dc.contributor.authorOzgur, Cem-
dc.contributor.authorVardi, Nigar-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:53:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:53:21Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932-
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/Fulltext/2016/10000/Is_More_Cortical_Bone_Decortication_Effective_on.68.aspx-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1646-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 USAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone decortication rate; guided bone augmentation; hydroxyapatite; beta-tricalcium phosphate; titanium membraneen_US
dc.subjectMICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; AUTOGENOUS BLOCK BONE; PLATELET-RICH FIBRIN; RABBIT CALVARIUM; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBULAR DEFECTS; TITANIUM BARRIER; RECIPIENT BED; REGENERATION; RECONSTRUCTIONen_US
dc.titleIs More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-2581-9050en_US
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1879en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1883en_US
Appears in Collections:Pedodonti

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.