Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1593
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Cangul-
dc.contributor.authorSariyilmaz, Evren-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:38:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:38:59Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.63496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.63496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/1593-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Aim of this study was to compare the double (DAP) and triple (TAP) antibiotic paste removal efficiency of conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), EndoActivator (EA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and XP-endo finisher (XPF) from simulated immature root canals. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 extracted mandibular canine roots were used. The apical 2 mm of the roots were removed, and Unicore drills were penetrated through the apical to the coronal direction approximately 1 mm to simulate an immature apex. Canals were prepared up to size 40 by using the Mtwo system. Roots were split longitudinally and then temporarily reassembled. The samples were randomly divided into 2 main groups as DAP and TAP. Five specimens for each main group were kept as negative control group. Then the pastes were placed with lentulo spiral. After 1 week five specimens for each main group were kept as positive control group. Then the remaining specimens in DAP and TAP groups were further assigned to 4 subgroups according to the removal technique (group 1: CSI; group 2: EA; group 3: PUI, group 4: XPF). The root halves were examined under a stereomicroscope at 10x magnification. Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: TAP and DAP were more effectively removed by XPF and PUI compared to CSI and EA (p<0.05). XPF and PUI DAP/TAP removal effectiveness was statistically similar (p>0.05). Moreover, CSI and EA showed similar effectiveness for both paste groups (p>0.05). Regarding the type of antibiotic paste, no significant difference between TAP and DAP was found (p>0.05). Conclusion: The tested irrigation systems could not completely remove either TAP or DAP. The use of PUI or the XPF was more effective compared to the use of the EA and CSI.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGALENOS YAYINCILIK, MOLLA GURANI MAHALLESI KACAMAK SOKAK NO 21, FINDIKZADE, ISTANBUL 34093, TURKEYen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.63496en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDouble antibiotic paste; triple antibiotic paste; regenerative endodontics; irrigation; removal efficiencyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Double and Triple Antibiotic Paste Removal Efficiency of Various Irrigation Protocolsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMEANDROS MEDICAL AND DENTAL JOURNALen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOrdu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage129en_US
dc.identifier.endpage136en_US
Appears in Collections:Endodonti

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.